About CIPP Connect

What we do

We survey the pipe with a camera, clean it and verify the clean, specify and install a cured-in-place liner, control and record the cure, cut every lateral back open, and survey the finished liner. One written scope covers all of it.

We also tell people to dig, when a collapse, a belly or a pipe that has to move makes lining the wrong method. A company that only owns lining equipment has a reason not to say that, which is exactly why it is worth saying.

Why it exists

Search for pipe lining and you will find two kinds of page. Contractor sites, which are honest about their own work and silent about the cases where lining is the wrong method. And thin aggregator pages, which answer nothing and exist to capture a phone number. We are the first kind, trying not to be silent about the second half.

The result is that the most consequential facts about this technique, that it does not fix a sag, that it cannot bridge a collapse, that the cleaning stage is where projects are quietly compromised, are hard to find in one place, written plainly.

That gap is the reason for this site. Several pages here exist mainly to tell a reader that lining is not their answer.

How it is paid, and what that means

Specialists pay to receive project descriptions. Visitors pay nothing, and any price quoted is a matter between the visitor and the company quoting it.

The incentive that creates is worth naming: a platform paid per project has a reason to encourage every visitor to submit one. The editorial policy below is the counterweight, and it is the thing to hold us to.

Editorial policy

• No prices, ranges or averages, because there is no bid data behind them. An invented figure becomes the anchor a real quote is judged against.
• No invented certifications, partners, reviews, client names or project counts. There are none, and there is no version of this site where there are.
• No standard paraphrased as if it were law. Statements originating in ASTM, NASSCO, OSHA or an environmental rule are named as such and marked for verification against the current edition.
• No categorical health, legal or regulatory advice. Where a question is one of those, it is sent to the professional who should answer it.
• No claim that a project will be quoted, or that a specialist is available in a given area.

Reporting an error

If something here is wrong, a technical statement, a description of a method, a characterization of a standard, we would rather be told than left to repeat it. Corrections are made once verified, and the pages carry a review date so it is visible when they were last looked at.

Contact details are on the legal notice.